The great monastic orders of the Christian West, the Benedictines and their relatives, the Cistercians, the Carthusians, the Camaldoese, exist down to our own day, even though the West cannot confidently anymore be considered Christian. But their numbers have decreased and for the most part are decreasing in a slow but steady manner. There is a great unknown involved in this development, one which sociologists, historians, and writers of every stripe have weighed in on, some saying it is the result of the upheavals of Vatican Council II, others the revolutionary changes within all of society from technological development to profound changes in social mores. I have no magic insight into the causes of this unsettling development, but I suspect it is reflective of all of the above. It seems, for whatever collective of causes, the traditional monastic orders are numerically in decline. The mean age of the orders members increases and the number of new members decreases.
If I do a Google search for monasticism I retrieve as many hits on the “new monasticism” as I do on the historical orders, such as the Cistercians and Benedictines. I take it the new monasticism is a movement of lay people, many married, who are attempting to live, with special focus on love of neighbor, especially the poor, the Gospel in community, often living together in the same house. It seems there is still an impulse to live a genuinely Christian life of sacrificial love, but within a different context than the cloister. I think this is wonderful; a sign the gospel is still lighting the flame of love and service within the hearts of men and women in our own time as it has throughout its history. And yet, I’m not so sure what the connection to monasticism is. Monastic life is something very particular, at least if I am to understand it historically, and is not really comprehensible if its definition is so broadened that any well meaning Christian community that lives communally can cal itself monastic, new or otherwise.
What are the elements that particularize monastic life, and those who live within its framework? One key attribute of the monk and nun has always been celibacy, the consecration of one’s entire being to God, including within this term, virginity (the avoidance of sexual relations), continence (the habit of mind of living chastely), and chastity (the moral virtue of purity). A life without celibacy just hasn’t ever been considered to be monastic, as the Latin root of the word monk , monachus, meaning one who lives alone, indicates. Interestingly, St. Benedict never mentions the promise of chastity in the monks vows, because it was considered so self-evidently a requirement to live a life of total dedication to God alone.
I’ll have future posts about some of the other essential elements of monastic life as it has been practiced throughout Christian history. But I return to my original question as to why so few people are entering the monastic orders today. Thomas Merton thought it had a lot to do with the interior life of modern man, which he felt suffers from a profound identity crisis, and one which the orders were ill equipped to handle. The result was many good vocations floundered and eventually left the monasteries. Maybe so, but the orders have made deep and principled changes, the result very much of a response to Vatican II and the needs of modern man. But the problem is not so much that large numbers of good vocations are leaving the monasteries, it’s that they aren’t ever coming at all.
So my question remains the same, and is one I only have sketchy ideas about why it has become so serious. The irony is that todays monasteries (and here again I am speaking about that which I know, namely the Cistercian monasteries) are living a monastic life that has gone through a prolonged self-examination with the result being that those men and women living in Cistercian monasteries today have been given the opportunity to live a true, honest, genuine form of monastic life, truly challenging and fully capable of providing the place to discover one’s true identity before God.
If others have ideas, please share them here. Does God still call men and women to monastic life today? If yes, why are so few responding? If no, why would this be? Are we just going through an historical anomaly, which will change with more people in the future once again responding to the call? Lots of questions, few answers.
Peace, and Happy New Year to all!
12 Responses to “Is God still calling?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

January 6th, 2006 at 9:03 am
I have not ever taken a college course on any religious subject so my knowledge might be somewhat limited. However, I have my own opinons of why vocations are dwindling. But I’m more interested in your comment that “the West cannot confidently anymore be considered Christian.” Could you explain that opinion a little further?
January 6th, 2006 at 10:40 am
God absolutely calls people to monastic life today. I am not exactly sure why so few even begin to accept, but I have some developing suspicions on why otherwise pious young people stay away based on my own experience.
It is hard to make a choice that closes off other good possibilities. In a society which values freedom, and in which freedom is mistakenly defined to be choosing between different possibilities, people have a tough time really seeing the point of monasticism. Even some people who are close to monasteries who have trouble understanding why Father so-and-so must excuse himself in the middle of a board meeting to go to prayers. I think the sacramental character of the life just escapes many people.
The natural anxiety people have in wanting to make the RIGHT vocational choice (especially in a choice and preference driven society) is probably also a big factor. There are so many good things a person can do in life; closing off options is a tough thing to do. I suspect a lot of people end up choosing another way of life by default– hedging their bets, afraid to decide, they choose not to choose.
I am moving toward what I suppose will be a lifetime of accepting a call—something I hope readers will find reassuring.
By the way, please pray for the monks of St. Gregory’s Abbey in Shawnee, OK, they are electing a new Abbot today.
January 6th, 2006 at 8:32 pm
Hello Aerial,
Thanks for your comment and for checking the blog; it’s nice to know
people are reading it and interested enough to respond.
My belief that the historical West cannot anymore confidently be
considered “Christian” is based on personal observation and my
reading over the years, set against the historical record. I think I
was a little loose with the phrase, because I’m refering mostly to
Europe, the home and core of the Western tradition, rather than the
United States. Still even here there is ample evidence that the
Christian identity of the country is eroding. Of course, this goes
hand-in-hand with counter indications, such as the rising attention
evangelical churches are getting.
There was a time not long ago when Europeans filled their churches to
overflowing, and the faith of the average person was the principal
linchpin of their identity; and by faith I mean a faith connected to
a faith community. Today, all over Europe the churches are empty,
with only a fraction of the population attending church on a regular
basis. I recommend an article in the February 2004 issue of First
Things by George Weigel where he says:
“European man has convinced himself that in order to be modern and
free, he must be radically secular. That conviction has had crucial,
indeed lethal, consequences for European public life and European
culture; indeed, that conviction and its public consequences are at
the root of Europe’s contemporary crisis of civilizational
morale.”
You can find the entire article here:
http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft0402/articles/weigel.html
Canada too has turned radically secular, evidenced by its recent
legislation. The United States is stronger in its Christian
identity, but here too there is a great struggle going on, one which
has yet to be fully played out.
So, I do think the West is in the final stages of a long-simmering
crisis of identity and one which does not look good for the future
health of our civilization.
Again, thanks for your comment Aerial.
Tim McFadden
January 6th, 2006 at 8:48 pm
Hello lemoine,
Yes, I too believe God is still calling, but it must be admitted that the vocations are not being fulfilled. I think your thoughts are valid and lead to more questions.
I truly think the answer lies within each of us. If I respond to God’s call to live my life in union with him then I can be a light to others. I’m happy to hear you are responding to God’s call for you. My prayers go with you!
Tim
January 10th, 2006 at 11:59 pm
Tim, what a great blog! You’re dealing with subjects that interest me greatly: monasticism, Thomas Merton, etc.
I look forward to reading more!
Bryan
January 12th, 2006 at 7:32 am
I agree with le moin: at least in America, our cultural emphasis on individual automony and freedom of choice make it hard to accept a life essentially composed of personal renunication. Also, as he said, even in discerning that life, is it very hard to give up the very “freedom” to discern. “If I enter, then I am no longer in charge of deciding what God wants me to do!” And how will you ever know if you made the “right” choice?
I can think of a few other possible factors. The over sexualization of the culture makes life-long chastity as a priest or religious of any nature seem a crazy choice; and the emphasis on material results makes the cloistered life of prayer seem especially irrelevant. Come on, if you have to be religious, why not at least teach schools, work for social justice, or do some other good for the world?
Besides these overarching ideas, the nitty-gritty details of the culture form man’s daily habits in a way antithetical to a contemplative life of prayer. Music and noise constantly, all day everywhere. Television and movies and internet and video games. I think many people would find the basic shape of monastic life so alien and offputting, because they have no answering call inside themselves to respond to its beauty. And in any case, they are too busy being busy, talking, shopping, filling their ears with noise, that they don’t think about it.
Finally, as I recently read on a monastery website, even those who are interested often do not persevere. Perhaps this goes back to your original point about identity. Perhaps the modern world has lost its identity (and so that of individuals as well) and if you don’t know who you are, how can you commit to something for the rest of your life? Only temporary connections are possible if you aren’t quite sure who you are today, and definately not who you will be tomorrow.
I myself am discerning a monastic vocation, and face a few of these issues in the process. Please say a prayer for me!
January 12th, 2006 at 6:58 pm
TheresaMF - I couldn’t agree more with what you’ve said; I think you’ve summarized many of the issues involved. I believe that all this activity, change, distraction effects us even on an physiological level. Our brains become adapted to all the frenzy, which then becomes the norm. Once this gets established, the quiet, order, and routine of the manoastery becomes difficult to adapt to, if not comprehend.
You’re in my prayers. May God grace you with the gift of a monastic vocation, and may you respond with a full and generous heart, just as our Lord has done for us. Peace!
January 19th, 2006 at 6:44 am
I agree with all that has been said. People are overwhelmed with consumerism and general “busyness” in today’s world. A life of solitude and surrender is difficult to imagine — and often thought of as “non-productive”. In today’s society, it is the quantity and quality of material goods that seems to matter. Prayer and surrender just don’t fit.
Although I think there is one more thought to consider. I do know a few folks who attempted to join a monastery, and were not accepted. Today’s monasteries have, I believe, a much greater sense of psychological testing and evalution then, let’s say, Merton’s time in the 1940’s.
Jane
January 19th, 2006 at 7:19 am
Jane,
There is no doubt people today are overwhelmed with the “busyness” of life. Acquisitiveness has many in its grip and leaves little room for the time and quiet needed to hear the voice of God calling. What is a bit of a mystery to me concerns the weight on us of these very things we race around acquiring would seeem to create a sort of paradoxical point when we would question all the activity. You know, that point when one stops and says “What’s it all about?”
It’s a reality that some folks have attempted to enter monastic life and have been turned down . It is no longer a simple matter of the desire to enter and the door is opened. Today, there is testing before admittance, and that’s all for the best. I do agree though that perhaps too much emphasis is placed on psychological considerations. It’s a difficult matter to balance and one I’m sure the monks take to heart.
Peace,
Tim
January 21st, 2006 at 7:57 am
Tim -
I agree there is a paridoxical point where we find the weight of our acquisitions still do not fill our ultimate needs — which — I believe lead us to seek our ultimate need…i.e. God alone. St Augustine: “Our souls are restless until they rest in Thee”.
I was at the Abbey of Gethsemani a few years ago, and heard a wonderful homily by Fr. Matthew Kelty on the value of monasticism in today’s world. You can read it at: http://www.bardstown.com/~brchrys/homilies/mk101403.htm
It is entitled: “Our Impractical Life”
Peace
Jane
January 22nd, 2006 at 11:26 pm
Hi Jane…Absolutely right! I too have spent some timeat the Abbey of Gethsemani and had Fr. Kelty as retreat master. He’s wonderful. thanks so much for the link. Hope others check it out. Peace.
January 28th, 2006 at 11:25 am
Believe that all comments capture pieces of the truth. Another reason may be the decline of devotion in our parishes. For example, when I was a kid we had real three hour devotions on Good Friday. People took the afternoon off from work and from noon until three we prayed. The church was packed. We really experienced the passion with Jesus. These days our church doesn’t call us to this kind of devotion. Seems that Father gets nervous if Mass runs over 60 minutes.